Staying on top of the latest HR terms and jargon can be a challenge in your field of expertise. We understand as an HR professional you’re always looking to expand your skills and knowledge, which is why we’ve compiled an extensive HR glossary.
The glossary is your go-to resource to help sharpen your acumen in this field. From commonly used HR words to more obscure Human Resources terms, the HR glossary covers it all. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, our library is a handy tool to have in your arsenal.
Home » HR Glossary » Salary Structure
A salary structure is the architectural blueprint for your company’s compensation. Think of it as the logical framework that dictates how and why people are paid what they are. It organises jobs into different levels or grades based on their value to the business and what the market is paying, bringing much-needed fairness and consistency to the table.
Imagine trying to build a house without a blueprint. You might end up with doors that lead nowhere, windows of odd sizes, and a foundation that can’t support the weight. The result? Chaos. The building would be unstable and deeply unfair to anyone living inside. A company without a formal salary structure runs in much the same way.
When you make pay decisions on the fly, inconsistencies creep in fast. A sharp negotiator might end up earning more than a quiet high-performer in the exact same role, which is a recipe for resentment and turnover. Without a defined framework, you’re flying blind—risking overpaying for some roles and underpaying for others, hurting both your budget and your ability to attract top talent. A salary structure replaces this guesswork with a clear strategy.
It gives you a transparent, defensible system for deciding pay. This isn’t just about rigid rules; it’s a powerful tool that connects your compensation philosophy directly to your business goals.
At its heart, a salary structure is all about striking a delicate balance between internal equity and external competitiveness. It ensures people in similar roles, with similar responsibilities, are paid fairly compared to their peers inside the company. At the same time, it makes sure your pay is competitive with what other companies in your industry and region are offering for the same talent.
This balance is absolutely critical. In India, for instance, the complex socioeconomic dynamics directly influence compensation. As of 2025, the average monthly salary is around ₹25,000 to ₹32,000, translating to an annual income between ₹3.0 lakh and ₹3.84 lakh. These numbers are heavily shaped by education, experience, and location, underscoring why a market-aware structure is non-negotiable. You can explore a comprehensive guide on the average salary in India to get a deeper sense of the market.
A well-designed framework helps you:
A salary structure transforms compensation from a subjective, often mysterious process into an objective, strategic function of the business. It answers the fundamental question of “why” behind every salary, building trust and reinforcing your company’s commitment to fairness.
The shift that happens when a company moves from a chaotic approach to a structured one is profound. The table below highlights just how powerful this transition can be, turning common pain points into strategic advantages.
Challenge Without a Structure | Solution With a Structure |
---|---|
Inconsistent and subjective pay decisions | Standardised pay grades and ranges ensure fairness |
High risk of pay inequity and discrimination | Creates a defensible and equitable pay system |
Difficulty attracting top talent with uncompetitive offers | Aligns pay with market data to remain competitive |
Lack of clear career progression for employees | Defines clear paths for salary and career growth |
Unpredictable and difficult-to-manage labour costs | Provides budget clarity with defined salary bands |
Ultimately, implementing a formal structure brings order, transparency, and strategic foresight to what is often an emotionally charged and confusing aspect of business.
To build a salary structure that actually works, you have to get to grips with its core components. Think of a payslip not as a single number, but as a puzzle where each piece has a specific purpose and legal weight. Getting clear on these building blocks is your first step toward creating compensation packages that are transparent, compliant, and genuinely attractive to top talent.
The heart of any salary is the Basic Salary. This is the fixed, non-negotiable part of an employee’s pay, typically making up 40% to 50% of their total package. It’s the solid foundation upon which everything else—from allowances to deductions like Provident Fund—is built. Your Basic Salary is fully taxable and reflects the core value of the role itself, without any performance-based extras mixed in.
Layered on top of this foundation are various allowances, designed to help employees cover specific expenses. These are your strategic tools for making a compensation package more appealing and, just as importantly, more tax-efficient for your team.
Allowances aren’t just fluff; they are smart additions that address real-life employee needs and can significantly boost their take-home pay. While there are dozens out there, a few have become standard practice across most Indian companies.
Here are the most common ones you’ll definitely come across:
Mastering these allowances is non-negotiable for any employer wanting to design competitive pay packages. For a deeper dive into crafting offers that get accepted, you might find some great insights in our resources for employers on how to optimise your hiring process. Each piece of the puzzle plays a role in how a job offer is perceived.
While allowances add to the gross salary, deductions are what you subtract to get to the final net or “take-home” pay. These aren’t optional—they are mandatory contributions that cover social security and keep you compliant with government regulations. Getting this part wrong can lead to serious legal and financial trouble.
It’s crucial to understand the journey from Gross to Net Salary. Gross Salary is the sum total of Basic Pay plus all allowances. Net Salary is what an employee actually sees in their bank account after all mandatory deductions have been made.
The main deductions you’ll handle are:
By getting a firm handle on these building blocks—the foundational Basic Salary, the strategic allowances, and the mandatory deductions—you empower yourself to build a salary structure that isn’t just legally sound, but also transparent and fair. This kind of clarity builds trust, helping your team see the real value of their total compensation, well beyond just the final number.
Picking the right salary structure is a bit like choosing the right operating system for your company. What works seamlessly for a massive, established corporation might feel clunky and restrictive for a nimble startup. There’s no single “correct” answer here, only the model that aligns best with your company culture, size, and strategic direction.
To build a framework that genuinely supports your business, you first need to understand the main philosophies behind compensation. Each one offers a different way to value roles and reward employees. Let’s break down the three most common frameworks: the traditional graded structure, the flexible broadbanding model, and the competitive market-based system.
Imagine a multi-storeyed building with a very clear staircase. That’s the traditional graded structure in a nutshell. Each floor represents a pay grade—a cluster of jobs with similar internal value and responsibilities. The staircase provides a well-defined path for employees to climb as they move from one level to the next through promotions.
This model is all about hierarchy and precision. Within each grade, there’s a specific salary range with a minimum, midpoint, and maximum. This setup allows for some variation based on experience and performance, but always within tightly controlled limits.
Ultimately, this structured approach promotes fairness and predictability, making it a reliable choice for organisations that value stability over agility.
If the graded structure is a staircase, then broadbanding is more like an open-plan office. This model consolidates the many narrow pay grades of a traditional system into just a few wide salary bands. For instance, instead of having ten separate grades for junior to senior professionals, you might have just two or three broad bands like “Professional,” “Manager,” and “Executive.”
This approach deliberately de-emphasises vertical promotions and instead encourages horizontal career growth. Employees can develop new skills and take on more complex projects to advance within their wide band, often without a formal change in job title.
Broadbanding shifts the focus from climbing the corporate ladder to deepening expertise. It supports a culture of continuous learning and rewards employees for skill development, not just title changes.
This flexibility is perfect for flatter, more agile companies where cross-functional collaboration is the norm. The main challenge? The wide pay ranges can sometimes lead to perceptions of inequity if not managed with transparent and robust performance metrics.
The market-based structure flips the script and takes an outside-in approach. Its number one goal is to ensure every role is paid competitively relative to the external market. The process starts with extensive salary benchmarking, gathering data on what other companies are paying for similar jobs in the same industry and location.
This external data is then used to define the midpoint of each salary range, anchoring your entire structure to real-world market rates. While internal job value is still part of the equation, the external market price takes priority. In today’s talent landscape, this is a critical strategy.
In India’s evolving economic scene, for example, staying market-aware is vital. In 2025, the average salary is seeing significant growth, with forecasted annual hikes of 9.5%. The average base salary is projected around ₹9.45 lakh per year, with sectors like IT and finance leading the charge. You can discover more about Indian salary trends to understand these competitive pressures.
A market-based salary structure directly addresses this challenge by making sure your offers are attractive enough to pull in top talent and compelling enough to keep them. It’s the most direct way to prevent losing your best people over compensation.
Deciding on a salary structure isn’t a one-and-done task. It requires a clear understanding of what each model offers and how it fits with your business reality. The table below compares the three main frameworks to help you weigh the pros and cons.
Model Type | Key Feature | Best For | Potential Drawback |
---|---|---|---|
Traditional Graded | Many narrow pay grades with defined steps for promotion. | Large, stable organisations with hierarchical structures. | Can be too rigid and may stifle rapid growth or skill development. |
Broadbanding | A few wide salary bands that encourage skill growth over promotions. | Agile, flat organisations that value cross-functional expertise. | Wide ranges can create pay equity concerns if not managed well. |
Market-Based | Salary ranges are primarily determined by external market data. | Companies in highly competitive industries fighting for top talent. | May undervalue roles that are unique or critical internally but have lower market rates. |
Each model brings its own strengths to the table. The key is to select the one that not only feels fair to your team but also acts as a strategic tool to help you achieve your long-term business goals.
Think of a well-designed salary structure as more than just an HR admin task. It’s a strategic asset, something that fuels your business growth from the inside out. When you get systematic about compensation, it creates powerful ripple effects across the whole organisation, strengthening everything from team morale right through to your bottom line.
Moving away from arbitrary, gut-feel pay decisions immediately instils a sense of fairness and transparency. This shift is a tangible sign of your commitment to equity, and it directly impacts how employees feel about their value to the company. The result? A more engaged, motivated, and loyal workforce—the bedrock of any successful enterprise.
In a competitive job market, your salary structure is one of your most powerful tools for attracting top performers. A clear, competitive framework lets you make confident and attractive offers, showing candidates that you value talent and have a logical system backing it up. This gives you a serious edge over competitors who are just guessing.
It’s just as important for retention. High turnover is expensive, not just in recruitment costs but also in lost productivity and institutional knowledge. A transparent salary structure helps keep your best people on board by:
This proactive approach to compensation is a game-changer for building a stable, high-performing team. For more ideas on this front, you can learn how to use creative compensation to boost your recruiting efforts.
Beyond talent management, a formal pay structure brings much-needed predictability to your finances. By setting clear salary ranges for every role, you can accurately forecast payroll expenses, manage your annual budget, and make smart decisions about headcount and expansion. This kind of financial discipline is absolutely vital for sustainable growth.
From a legal standpoint, a structured approach is your best defence against pay discrimination claims. With pay transparency laws becoming more common, having a documented, equitable system isn’t just good practice—it’s a necessity. It gives you an objective basis for every compensation decision, protecting your organisation from significant legal and reputational risk.
A strong salary structure transforms compensation from a reactive expense into a proactive investment. It aligns pay with business strategy, ensuring every rupee spent on payroll drives motivation, supports retention, and strengthens your competitive position.
India’s dynamic workforce of over 1.46 billion people presents unique opportunities and challenges. With an average annual income of approximately ₹3,58,000, the demand for skilled labour in sectors like IT and finance is intense. The country’s global hiring confidence rate of 43% highlights its role as a major talent hub, making a competitive and fair salary structure essential for any business operating here.
Ultimately, getting your salary structure right isn’t just about ticking an HR box. It’s a core business function that drives employee engagement, gives you a competitive advantage in hiring, ensures financial stability, and minimises legal exposure. It’s an indispensable tool for long-term success.
Building a formal salary structure can feel like a huge undertaking, but it’s really just a logical process you can break down into manageable steps. Think of it like assembling a high-performance engine for your business. Every part needs to be carefully chosen and fitted perfectly to make sure the whole system runs smoothly, fairly, and efficiently.
This guide is your practical roadmap, designed to take you from a rough concept to a fully-functioning compensation framework. Follow these steps, and you’ll build a structure that doesn’t just support your business goals but also builds trust and transparency with your people.
This infographic gives you a bird’s-eye view of the core process, breaking it down into job analysis, market benchmarking, and finally, assigning bands.
As you can see, the flow is critical: you must start with a solid internal evaluation before you ever look at external market data.
Before you can figure out what a job is worth, you need to know what the job is. This is the absolute foundation. It involves systematically gathering intel on the duties, responsibilities, skills, and expected outcomes for every single role in your organisation. It’s about looking past the job title to get to the real value of the position.
Your goal here is to create detailed, up-to-date job descriptions that are an honest reflection of the work being done. This isn’t just an HR task; you need to get input from managers and the employees themselves to paint a complete picture. Once that’s done, you can conduct a job evaluation to determine the relative worth of each role within your company, which helps you create a clear internal hierarchy.
With a solid grip on your internal job landscape, it’s time to look outside your own four walls. Market benchmarking is all about researching what other companies are paying for similar jobs in your industry and location. This is how you make sure your compensation is competitive enough to attract—and keep—the talent you need to win.
You can pull this essential data from a few places:
The real aim here is to find the market rate for your benchmark jobs—these are the common roles that are easy to compare across different companies. This data becomes the anchor for your entire salary structure, keeping it grounded in reality.
Once you know both the internal value and external market rate for your jobs, you can start organising them into logical groups. A pay grade is simply a way of bundling together jobs that are similar in scope, responsibility, and overall value to the business. For instance, all your senior managers might land in one grade, while your entry-level pros land in another.
This step massively simplifies your compensation plan. Instead of trying to manage hundreds of individual salaries, you’re now managing a much smaller, more coherent set of pay grades. It creates consistency and makes the whole system much easier to manage and explain to your team.
For each pay grade you’ve created, the next move is to build a salary range. This range sets the minimum, midpoint, and maximum pay for any job that falls within that grade. Each point in that range has a specific job to do.
The distance between the minimum and maximum, known as the “spread,” can vary. A typical range spread is 40-50%, but you can adjust this based on the salary structure model you’ve chosen. Broader bands, for example, will naturally have much wider spreads.
The final step is arguably the most important: rolling it out and communicating it. A brilliant new salary structure that’s poorly explained will create more anxiety and confusion than the old system ever did. You have to be ready to explain the changes clearly, transparently, and with a good dose of empathy.
Tell your people the “why” behind the new structure. Explain how it promotes fairness, keeps you competitive, and creates clear pathways for their career growth. Crucially, train your managers so they can confidently field questions from their teams. Providing this context is absolutely essential for getting employee buy-in and ensuring the long-term success of your new compensation framework.
Putting a salary structure in place is a massive achievement, but the work doesn’t stop there. Think of it less like a finished project and more like a living document that needs regular care to stay healthy and effective. The market is always shifting—inflation, competitor moves, and your own business strategy evolve, and your compensation framework has to keep up to stay relevant.
This ongoing maintenance is absolutely critical for keeping your pay competitive and fair. If you don’t periodically review your structure, even the most perfectly designed framework will slowly drift out of alignment with the market. Before you know it, you risk losing your top performers to competitors who are paying closer attention.
To stop your salary structure from becoming a relic of the past, you need a consistent review schedule. The idea is to be proactive, adjusting your pay bands to reflect what’s happening in the economy and your industry, rather than scrambling to react when people start handing in their notice.
A solid best practice is to schedule a formal review at least once a year. This annual check-in is your chance to make sure the framework is still holding up against inflation and broader market shifts.
Your yearly review should cover a few key things:
A dynamic salary structure is a sign of a responsive and forward-thinking organisation. It demonstrates a commitment to fair pay and acknowledges that the value of talent is not static.
Of course, the day-to-day will always throw you some curveballs. Two of the most common compensation challenges involve employees whose pay falls outside the standard range for their role.
Red-Circled Employees: These are team members who are paid above the maximum for their pay grade. This often happens after a reorganisation or simply due to long tenure. Instead of a pay cut, a better approach is to freeze their base salary and offer lump-sum bonuses for strong performance until the pay range eventually catches up to them.
Green-Circled Employees: On the flip side, you have employees paid below the minimum for their grade. This is a red flag for equity issues and needs to be addressed quickly. You should map out a clear plan to get their salary up to the minimum within a reasonable timeframe.
Effectively handling these situations, along with promotions and job re-evaluations, is essential. This is where high-impact hiring driven by data can inform not just your initial offers but also your internal mobility and pay adjustment strategies. For more on this, you can explore insights on how Recruitment Process Outsourcing can help in high-impact hiring driven by data. A responsive approach ensures your salary structure remains a powerful tool for attracting, motivating, and keeping the talent you need to win.
Even with a perfectly designed salary structure, you’re going to get questions. It’s only natural. Getting ahead of these common queries is a great way to build trust and make sure everyone—from your leadership team to new hires—understands the “why” behind your compensation strategy.
Let’s tackle some of the most frequent questions that pop up for HR leaders and employees.
Think of it like a regular health check-up. The best practice is to review your salary structure annually against the latest market data. This keeps you competitive. A yearly review ensures your pay ranges are keeping pace with industry shifts and inflation, so you don’t accidentally fall behind the curve.
Now, an annual market adjustment is one thing, but a complete overhaul is another. You probably only need a full-scale redesign every two to three years. However, if your business goes through a major change—like a merger, a period of rapid growth, or a big strategic pivot—that should absolutely trigger a deeper, more comprehensive review of the entire framework.
It’s easy to get these two mixed up, but they work hand-in-hand to create a logical system. Here’s a simple way to think about it:
A pay grade is the bucket. It’s a level used to group jobs that have a similar level of responsibility and internal value. For instance, all “Senior Managers” might be clustered into Grade 5.
A salary range is what’s inside the bucket. It’s the specific financial spectrum—with a clear minimum, midpoint, and maximum—that’s attached to that pay grade. So, for Grade 5, the salary range might be ₹18 lakh to ₹28 lakh.
Simply put, the grade organises the roles, while the range defines the pay for those roles.
A pay grade organises the roles, while a salary range determines the financial boundaries for those roles. One provides the category, the other provides the numbers.
Yes, and they absolutely should be. This isn’t just possible; it’s a core feature of a well-built, fair salary structure. While two people might share the same job title and belong to the same pay grade, their actual spot within that salary range can—and often should—be different.
This difference is how you recognise individual value. There are several good reasons why two employees in the same role might have different salaries:
Experience Level: An employee with a decade of solid experience is naturally going to command a higher salary than someone who’s just two years into their career.
Performance Metrics: Your consistent high-flyer who always smashes their targets deserves to be compensated closer to the top of the range.
Specialised Skills: If an employee has a rare, in-demand skill that gives your team a unique edge, their pay should reflect that.
This flexibility is crucial. It lets you reward performance and experience fairly without breaking the bank or creating internal inequity.
Ready to build a compensation framework that attracts and retains top talent? Taggd specialises in data-driven recruitment and HR strategies that align with your business goals. Discover how our RPO solutions can strengthen your organisation at https://taggd.in.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |