Staying on top of the latest HR terms and jargon can be a challenge in your field of expertise. We understand as an HR professional you’re always looking to expand your skills and knowledge, which is why we’ve compiled an extensive HR glossary.
The glossary is your go-to resource to help sharpen your acumen in this field. From commonly used HR words to more obscure Human Resources terms, the HR glossary covers it all. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, our library is a handy tool to have in your arsenal.
Home » HR Glossary » Shortlisting
Did you know that shortlisting is considered the most challenging and lengthy step in the hiring journey? It’s true – and even worse, 50% of job seekers surveyed have turned down offers simply because the hiring process took too long.
When faced with hundreds of applications, creating an effective shortlisting process becomes crucial for recruitment success. According to industry data, the average applicant-to-interview conversion rate is about 15%, meaning for every 100 applications you receive, only 15 candidates should move forward. However, many companies struggle with this critical stage, sometimes finding it difficult to identify qualified candidates or taking too long to make decisions.
Fortunately, there’s a better way. Shortlisting candidates not only helps speed up your hiring process but also allows you to better manage the entire recruitment journey. In this guide, we’ll show you exactly how to cut your resume shortlisting time in half while still finding the perfect candidates for your open positions. Whether you’re drowning in applications or simply want to improve your screening and shortlisting techniques, these recruiter-tested strategies will transform how you evaluate potential hires.
“Hiring people is an art, not a science, and resumes can’t tell you whether someone will fit into a company’s culture.” — Howard Schultz, Former CEO and Chairman of Starbucks
Shortlisting represents a crucial stage in the recruitment process where employers review applications and select the most qualified candidates to move forward in the hiring journey. Essentially, it’s the process of creating a “short” list of candidates from a larger applicant pool based on predetermined criteria.
After publishing a job advertisement and collecting applications, shortlisting serves as the bridge between initial screening and conducting interviews. During this phase, recruiters and hiring managers carefully review resumes, cover letters, and other relevant documents to identify individuals who best match the position requirements.
The fundamental purpose of shortlisting is to streamline the hiring process by narrowing down a large number of applications to a manageable number of qualified candidates. This becomes increasingly important as organizations face larger volumes of applicants—especially with the rise of remote work removing geographical limitations. Furthermore, shortlisting establishes standards for ideal candidates and provides valuable insight into your recruiting strategy.
Before beginning the shortlisting process, organizations typically create two distinct categories of criteria:
The evaluation process involves examining how well each candidate’s qualifications, skills, and experiences align with the job requirements. Recruiters pay particular attention to educational achievements, relevant work experience, specialized training, and certifications pertinent to the role. In fact, many organizations use standardized scoring rubrics to ensure fair and objective assessment across all applicants.
Throughout the shortlisting process, attention must be paid to both technical capabilities and cultural fit. A holistic approach considers not only professional qualifications but additionally soft skills, personality traits, communication abilities, teamwork potential, and leadership qualities that would contribute to a candidate’s success.
Typically, the shortlisting workflow follows this pattern: First, organizations review or write the job description containing primary duties and required skills. Subsequently, they establish clear criteria based on these requirements. As applications arrive, hiring managers compare them against these predetermined standards, rating each candidate accordingly. By the application deadline, only candidates meeting all essential requirements remain on the shortlist.
The benefits of a structured shortlisting approach are substantial. LinkedIn’s Global Recruiting Trends reports that structured hiring improves quality-of-hire by up to 40%. Moreover, effective shortlisting has helped some organizations cut hiring cycles by up to 30% while maintaining high-quality standards.
Some companies choose to shortlist a percentage of applicants rather than a fixed number, whereas others analyze past interview-to-hiring conversion rates to determine the optimal number to move forward. Regardless of the specific approach, the goal remains the same—to identify candidates who not only possess the necessary technical qualifications but who will thrive within the organization’s culture and contribute to its long-term vision.
As the recruitment landscape evolves, particularly with rising unemployment creating larger applicant pools, the pressure on effective screening and shortlisting processes continues to increase. Consequently, mastering this critical step becomes essential for recruitment success in today’s competitive hiring environment.
Every recruitment professional faces the challenge of finding qualified candidates from a sea of applications. Shortlisting offers a strategic solution to this common hurdle. Unlike simply reviewing resumes randomly, a structured shortlisting process brings remarkable efficiency and effectiveness to your hiring efforts.
The volume of applications has soared in recent years, with job openings now receiving an average of 222 applications — almost three times more than in 2021. Facing this avalanche of resumes, many hiring teams feel overwhelmed. First and foremost, shortlisting helps make this large volume manageable through systematic evaluation.
When implemented properly, shortlisting allows you to:
Beyond that, shortlisting enables you to set clear standards for your hiring process. Many talent acquisition leaders consider identifying the right candidates from a large applicant pool the most challenging part of recruitment. By establishing predetermined criteria, you create a framework that helps your team make objective decisions even when faced with hundreds of applications.
For positions attracting massive application volumes, consider implementing “knockout questions” related to basic qualifications. These yes/no questions can immediately filter out candidates who don’t meet minimum requirements, dramatically reducing your workload. For instance, if a role requires two years of customer service experience, simply ask: “Do you have at least two years of customer service experience?”
Not surprisingly, candidate experience plays a crucial role in successful hiring. Indeed, 78% of candidates report that the overall experience they receive during hiring indicates how the organization values its people. A well-structured shortlisting process directly enhances this experience.
A LinkedIn study found that structured hiring improves quality-of-hire by up to 40%. This improvement extends to candidates as well. Even rejected candidates benefit from a clear, organized process that respects their time and effort.
Consider this sobering statistic: 65% of companies lose their best candidates due to lengthy hiring procedures. At the same time, only 9% of candidates schedule their first interview within a day of applying, while 31% say it takes two to three weeks. This delay creates frustration and damages your employer brand.
Through effective shortlisting, candidates receive faster responses and clearer communication. Even those who don’t advance appreciate transparency — 81% of job seekers say that receiving continuous status updates significantly improves their overall experience.
The average hiring process takes approximately 28 days, yet high-performing companies aim to complete it in under 20 days. This difference is significant since delayed hiring means lost productivity, increased costs, and potential candidate drop-offs.
By implementing a structured shortlisting process, my clients have cut hiring cycles by up to 30% while maintaining top-tier quality. This acceleration comes from several improvements:
Creating clear selection criteria allows your team to quickly and consistently evaluate applications. Instead of reviewing each resume with varying standards, a checklist of required qualifications standardizes the process.
Furthermore, shortlisting frees up valuable resources by focusing attention only on qualified candidates. Given that 75-88% of resumes received are unqualified for the position, eliminating these applications early saves countless hours.
The time savings extend throughout the hiring journey. Half of all candidates would refuse an otherwise attractive job offer if they had a negative experience during recruitment. By shortlisting effectively, you create a more engaging and transparent hiring process that keeps candidates invested throughout, reducing the risk of losing your most qualified prospects.
The bottom line? Shortlisting isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about creating a hiring process that works better for everyone involved. Whether you typically receive a dozen applications or thousands, the benefits of systematic shortlisting make it an essential practice for modern recruitment.
Creating an effective shortlisting process requires a systematic approach. By following these six steps, you’ll cut your candidate review time in half without sacrificing quality.
The initial review stage sets the foundation for successful shortlisting. I recommend creating a resume scoring rubric before diving in, as this ensures fair and consistent evaluation across all applications.
When reviewing resumes, follow a two-phase approach: first, quickly scan for keywords, proper grammar, and professionalism. Then, conduct a deeper examination of skills, qualifications, and employment history.
Pay special attention to customized applications—those tailored specifically to your company and role indicate serious candidates. Look beyond basic duties to find candidates who quantify their achievements with specific examples of adding value. Remember that almost 99% of large companies now utilize ATS (Applicant Tracking Systems) to streamline this process.
Clearly distinguishing between “must-haves” and “nice-to-haves” is crucial for effective shortlisting. Essential criteria represent non-negotiable qualifications a candidate must possess to perform the job’s core responsibilities. These might include specific education levels, certifications, or minimum experience.
In contrast, desirable criteria are the “nice-to-haves” that enhance an application yet aren’t critical for the role. For instance, proficiency with particular software or additional certifications might give candidates an edge without being absolute requirements.
The distinction becomes particularly important when dealing with large applicant pools, as desirable criteria often determine who advances when many candidates meet all essential requirements.
A structured scorecard transforms subjective impressions into objective evaluations. This standardized tool allows all interviewers to rate candidates on the same set of job-relevant competencies using a consistent scale.
Your scorecard should include:
Utilizing scorecards offers multiple benefits: eliminating unrealistic expectations, encouraging collaborative hiring, reducing personal bias, and ensuring focus on job requirements only. Furthermore, scorecards provide quantitative data that helps predict which candidates will succeed in the role.
Once you’ve evaluated all applications, the next step involves ranking candidates against your predetermined criteria. Begin by filtering out applications missing essential qualifications. Then rank remaining candidates using your scorecard.
Modern ATS systems utilize AI algorithms to analyze and rank candidates based on predefined parameters. These systems can extract key information from resumes, including education, experience, skills, and certifications. For maximum effectiveness, assign different weights to various criteria based on their importance to the role.
If your shortlist remains too large after initial filtering, consider adding a preliminary screening step—like a brief phone call—before formal interviews.
Notifying selected candidates promptly is essential for keeping top talent engaged. Email represents the most efficient communication method, providing both speed and a documented record of details.
Your notification should:
Finally, handling rejections professionally maintains your employer brand integrity. A well-crafted rejection email includes thanking the candidate, providing a brief explanation, and ending on a positive note.
Avoid generic statements like “Unfortunately, you have been rejected”. Instead, consider more thoughtful phrasing such as “We’d like to emphasize that not getting selected at one company doesn’t mean the candidate is bad—it simply means that the job wasn’t the right fit”.
For candidates further along in the process, consider a phone call before sending a follow-up email. Throughout all communications, maintain a tone of respect and appreciation for the candidate’s time.
“Diversity is being invited to the party; inclusion is being asked to dance.” — Verna Myers, Vice President, Inclusion Strategy at Netflix; renowned diversity and inclusion expert
Fair recruitment stands as a cornerstone of effective hiring. In fact, even with the best shortlisting system in place, unconscious bias can significantly undermine your recruitment efforts if left unchecked.
Fairness in recruitment begins with recognizing what the law protects. Under the Equality Act 2010, nine protected characteristics are safeguarded against discrimination: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. Understanding these characteristics forms the foundation of equitable shortlisting.
As recruiters, we have a legal obligation to ensure our shortlisting process doesn’t discriminate against candidates based on these attributes. This means:
Beyond legal compliance, recognizing protected characteristics actually widens your talent pool. Admittedly, in rare circumstances, you may use positive action during recruitment – but only as a tiebreaker between equally qualified candidates, and strictly as a last resort after exhausting all non-discriminatory selection methods.
Blind screening represents one of the most effective ways to minimize bias during candidate evaluation. This practice involves removing personally identifiable information from applications, ensuring evaluations focus solely on qualifications and skills.
A US field experiment on Labor Market Discrimination revealed that “resumes with Caucasian sounding names like Emily Walsh or Greg Baker were 50% more likely to get a call-backthan the identical resume with an African American sounding name”. This startling statistic demonstrates why blind screening matters.
To implement blind screening effectively:
This approach shifts focus to what truly matters—candidates’ skills and experience—rather than irrelevant personal details that might trigger unconscious bias.
Having multiple people evaluate candidates substantially reduces the impact of individual biases. A study exploring the impact of using dual reviewers compared to a single reviewer found that the average increase in eligible candidates identified using two reviewers was 9%, ranging from 0% to 32%.
Throughout the shortlisting process, I recommend:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, the Institute of Medicine, and the Cochrane Collaboration all recommend using two or more team members working independently to screen candidates. Even though this requires additional resources, the reduction in bias justifies the investment.
Furthermore, evidence-based decisions during shortlisting should focus on concrete data rather than subjective “gut feelings”. By implementing these practices, we create a more equitable shortlisting process that not only complies with legal requirements but actually improves the quality of your candidate pool through fairer, more objective evaluation.
Modern technology has dramatically transformed the shortlisting process, enabling recruiters to evaluate candidates more efficiently. Let’s explore the most effective tools that can cut your shortlisting time in half.
Using an Applicant Tracking System represents the foundation of efficient shortlisting. Notably, 94% of recruiters who use an ATS report improved hiring processes. These systems automate resume screening, organize candidate information, and track applications throughout the recruitment cycle.
A quality ATS offers several advantages:
Despite these benefits, standard ATS technology has limitations. Many systems operate as relatively “dumb” technology that cannot learn from previous hiring decisions. Plus, candidates sometimes game these systems through keyword matching, creating potential false positives.
Candidate scorecards standardize evaluation, making the shortlisting process more consistent and fair. These tools allow hiring teams to rate applicants using predetermined criteria specifically tailored to each role.
Automated scoring algorithms typically analyze six core data points: skills match percentage, experience relevance, education alignment, location compatibility, salary expectations, and career progression. The system assigns numerical scores from 0-100 based on weighted criteria established by hiring managers.
Obviously, implementing scorecards brings significant benefits—they remove subjectivity, serve as formal documentation for hiring decisions, and provide a significantly better chance of selecting high-quality candidates.
AI chatbots represent an innovative approach to initial candidate screening. These tools simulate human conversation using text messaging and natural language processing, helping candidates navigate the application process while simultaneously gathering essential information.
Chatbots collect basic information such as CVs and work experience, then screen it based on job criteria. Furthermore, after determining a candidate is qualified, chatbots can automatically advance them in the hiring process and prompt them to schedule interviews.
The impact is substantial—according to WifiTalents, 43% of companies using AI in recruitment processes report reduced hiring time. Coupled with the fact that recruiters spend more than 80% of their time on low value-add activities, chatbots provide an ideal solution for busy recruitment teams.
Important to realize is that these technologies work best in combination. Modern automated matching systems achieve 85-92% accuracy in identifying qualified candidates compared to 60-70% accuracy from manual screening.
The recruitment landscape has evolved beyond traditional resume reviews, with forward-thinking organizations now embracing innovative shortlisting approaches that save time while improving candidate quality.
Breaking from conventional hiring sequences, implementing assessments at the beginning of the recruitment process yields remarkable benefits. Traditionally, candidates complete skill tests after initial interviews; nevertheless, moving these evaluations earlier helps filter out unqualified applicants sooner. For maximum effectiveness, include assessments directly in the application process itself—this attracts only high-intent job seekers genuinely interested in the position.
Early skill testing serves two crucial purposes. First, it provides objective data about candidates’ abilities before you invest time in interviews. Second, it evaluates soft skills like communication and adaptability—traits that 89% of recruiters say determine success when a hire doesn’t work out. These preliminary assessments allow you to create a shortlist based on demonstrated abilities rather than resume claims.
Advanced AI tools now go beyond basic keyword matching to analyze resumes with unprecedented precision. These systems:
Harnessing these capabilities requires optimizing your job descriptions. The most effective approach involves analyzing postings through keyword identification tools that extract the most relevant terms and skills. This ensures your shortlisting criteria align perfectly with what you’re truly seeking.
While automation streamlines shortlisting, maintaining a human touch remains essential. Holistic evaluation considers technical capabilities alongside soft skills, career growth potential, and cultural alignment.
This approach utilizes multiple assessment methods—structured interviews, group exercises, and psychometric tests—to evaluate candidates from various angles. Tools like Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) simulate real-world scenarios, assessing decision-making and problem-solving abilities. Similarly, incorporating tests like Myers-Briggs or Predictive Index helps determine team fit.
Ultimately, this comprehensive method ensures you identify candidates who possess both technical qualifications and the intangible qualities needed for long-term success.
Effective candidate shortlisting stands as a pivotal element in modern recruitment success. Throughout this guide, we’ve explored how structured shortlisting dramatically reduces hiring time while maintaining—and often improving—candidate quality.
The evidence clearly shows that shortlisting offers multiple advantages beyond simple time-saving. First and foremost, it helps manage overwhelming applicant pools through systematic evaluation rather than random selection. Additionally, a well-designed shortlisting process significantly enhances candidate experience, preventing the loss of top talent due to lengthy procedures.
Most organizations struggle with lengthy hiring cycles, yet shortlisting cuts this time dramatically. Remember that candidates often judge your company based on their recruitment experience—efficient shortlisting demonstrates respect for their time and professionalism.
The six-step process we outlined transforms chaotic resume reviews into a streamlined operation: reviewing applications systematically, defining clear criteria, creating standardized scorecards, ranking candidates objectively, notifying shortlisted individuals promptly, and handling rejections professionally.
Fairness remains paramount throughout this process. Blind screening techniques, multiple reviewers, and awareness of protected characteristics safeguard against unconscious bias while widening your talent pool. These practices don’t just satisfy legal requirements—they actively improve hiring outcomes.
Modern tools further accelerate this process. Applicant Tracking Systems, automated scorecards, and pre-screening chatbots reduce manual work substantially. The combination of these technologies with innovative techniques like early skill assessments, keyword-based shortlisting, and holistic candidate evaluation creates a powerfully efficient system.
You now possess everything needed to transform your shortlisting process. By implementing these strategies, you’ll cut shortlisting time in half while identifying better-qualified candidates. Start with small changes—perhaps implementing a standardized scorecard or blind screening—then gradually incorporate more advanced techniques as your confidence grows.
Above all, remember that shortlisting isn’t merely about efficiency; it fundamentally improves how candidates experience your organization from their first application. A thoughtful, well-structured shortlisting process becomes your competitive advantage in today’s challenging talent marketplace.
Master these proven strategies to transform your recruitment process and identify top talent faster than ever before.
The key to recruitment success lies in balancing efficiency with fairness. When you combine structured processes with modern tools, you create a shortlisting system that respects candidates’ time while identifying the best talent for your organization.
An effective shortlisting process involves reviewing applications, defining essential and desirable criteria, creating candidate scorecards, ranking and filtering candidates, notifying shortlisted candidates, and sending professional rejection emails to those not selected.
Technology can significantly enhance shortlisting through Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) that automate resume screening, automated scorecards for standardized evaluation, and AI chatbots for initial candidate screening. These tools can reduce manual work and improve efficiency.
To ensure fairness, use blind screening techniques to remove personally identifiable information, involve multiple reviewers to reduce individual bias, and be aware of protected characteristics to avoid discrimination. These practices not only comply with legal requirements but also improve the quality of your candidate pool.
Implementing skill assessments early in the recruitment process helps filter out unqualified applicants sooner, provides objective data about candidates’ abilities before interviews, and evaluates both hard and soft skills. This approach allows for shortlisting based on demonstrated abilities rather than just resume claims.
A structured shortlisting process helps manage large applicant pools more effectively, improves candidate experience by providing faster responses and clearer communication, and can reduce hiring time by up to 30% while maintaining high-quality standards. It also ensures consistency in evaluating candidates and helps focus resources on the most promising applicants
Curious about more HR buzzwords like privilege leave, casual leave, leave encashment, relieving letter, resignation letter or more? Dive into our HR Glossary and get clear definitions of the terms that drive modern HR.
Explore Taggd for RPO solutions.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |