Staying on top of the latest HR terms and jargon can be a challenge in your field of expertise. We understand as an HR professional you’re always looking to expand your skills and knowledge, which is why we’ve compiled an extensive HR glossary.
The glossary is your go-to resource to help sharpen your acumen in this field. From commonly used HR words to more obscure Human Resources terms, the HR glossary covers it all. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, our library is a handy tool to have in your arsenal.
Home » HR Glossary » Inclusion
For years, I thought I understood what do you mean by inclusion – simply letting everyone participate. However, my perspective shifted dramatically when I learned that inclusion is actually a universal human right that embraces all people regardless of their race, gender, disability, medical or other needs.
Despite often being used interchangeably, the terms diversity and inclusion indicate different efforts. The meaning of inclusion goes beyond just representation; it creates an environment where everyone feels respected, valued, and has equal opportunities regardless of their background or identity. When explaining the concept of inclusion, it’s important to recognize that it refers to a practice of including and accommodating people who often face discrimination and exclusion due to various aspects of their identity.
In fact, the most marginalized individuals can reveal how much an organization may lack true inclusion. Throughout this article, I’ll share how my understanding evolved and why inclusion matters in schools, workplaces, and our broader society. The journey changed not just what I knew about inclusion but how I see my role in creating more inclusive spaces.
At its core, the concept of inclusion from Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) represents an environment where everyone is treated fairly and respectfully. According to dictionaries, inclusion is simply “the act of including” or “the state of being included”. Nevertheless, the practical meaning goes much deeper than this basic definition.
Inclusion essentially means creating an environment where everyone feels respected, valued, and has equal opportunities to participate fully, regardless of their background or identity. This concept extends beyond mere tolerance – it’s about genuine acceptance and integration.
In workplace contexts, inclusion refers to “the achievement of a work environment in which all individuals are treated fairly and respectfully, have equal access to opportunities and resources, and contribute fully to the organization’s success”.
Socially, inclusion means improving people’s ability to participate in society on equal terms. The World Summit for Social Development in Copenhagen defined an inclusive society as “a society for all” – where every individual has the same rights, responsibilities, and an active role to play.
Primarily, inclusion addresses the barriers that prevent certain groups from fully participating in political, economic, and social life. These barriers may exist through:
Many people confuse diversity and inclusion, yet they represent distinctly different concepts. Generally speaking, diversity focuses on the “what” – the makeup of your workforce, community, or organization. Inclusion, alternatively, centers on the “how” – creating an environment that enables everyone to participate and thrive.
As one factual source clearly states, “Diversity is simply the existence of a group of people, inclusion is how that group is treated and works together”. Using a helpful analogy, if we think of diversity and inclusion as a puzzle, diversity represents the puzzle pieces, while inclusion shows how those pieces fit together to form the complete picture.
An organization or community can be diverse without being inclusive. This happens when one group receives special treatment or another group faces discrimination. Additionally, a workplace might have many different genders, races, and identities present, but if only certain perspectives carry authority or influence, that environment lacks true inclusion.
This distinction reveals why inclusion requires active, ongoing effort. While diversity might be achieved through recruitment, inclusion demands cultural change and continuous commitment.
Representation alone – having diverse people present – doesn’t guarantee inclusion. Consequently, the diversity that lacks genuine inclusion often becomes what experts call “tokenism”. A truly inclusive environment doesn’t just have diversity of people present but ensures diverse people are “involved, developed, empowered, and trusted”.
Furthermore, inclusion creates tangible benefits both individually and collectively. Organizations with inclusive cultures see more angles on potential problems, develop smarter solutions, and better identify biases in what they’re creating. Such environments enable all employees to find senior people who will endorse their ideas and support their development.
The economic case for inclusion is equally compelling. Globally, the loss in human capital wealth due to gender inequality alone is estimated at INR 13517.75 trillion. Social exclusion robs individuals of dignity and opportunity while creating costs at both individual and societal levels. These costs include lost wages, poor education and employment outcomes, and physical and mental health impacts.
Moreover, inclusion proves vital for addressing trauma and improving wellbeing. Research shows that participating in society and having reliable social connections are key determinants of health and among the most powerful predictors of positive outcomes following trauma exposure.
As opposed to simply being nice or politically correct, inclusion represents a basic human right enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It acknowledges that feeling represented matters more than just being included – people want to know they are truly heard, even when their ideas aren’t implemented.
Through this deeper understanding, we see that inclusion transcends representation, creating environments where everyone can contribute their full, authentic selves for mutual benefit.
Looking around at everyday spaces, I notice that inclusion isn’t just a theoretical concept—it’s a living practice that shows up differently across various environments. Seeing inclusion in action helps us understand what is meant by inclusion beyond definitions. Let’s explore how it manifests in three critical areas of daily life.
Inclusive education creates learning environments where all children have fair opportunities to learn and develop necessary skills. Throughout educational settings, inclusion means all children learning in the same classrooms and schools, rather than separating students based on abilities or backgrounds.
UNICEF identifies inclusive education as “the most effective way to give all children a fair chance to go to school, learn and develop the skills they need to thrive”. This approach doesn’t just benefit children with disabilities—it extends to speakers of minority languages and other traditionally excluded groups.
In practice, inclusive classrooms often feature:
Particularly powerful is how inclusive education allows “diverse groups to grow side by side, to the benefit of all”. Rather than focusing solely on accommodation, true inclusion in education values the unique contributions that students from all backgrounds bring to the learning environment.
The workplace represents another sphere where inclusion significantly impacts daily life. An inclusive workplace environment is “one where every employee, regardless of background, identity or ability, feels valued, heard and empowered to contribute”.
The business case for inclusion is compelling—organizations with diverse leadership outperform their peers by 36% in profitability, as per McKinsey and Company. Furthermore, 76% of job seekers consider workplace diversity a deciding factor when evaluating job offers.
Everyday acts of inclusion in workplaces often come down to individual behaviors. These might include:
In this context, what is inclusion? It goes beyond representation—it’s about fostering belonging through daily interactions. As one source notes, “Changing an organization’s culture does not happen overnight… Instead, it takes individuals modelling the workplace culture they desire”.
In the digital age, inclusion meaning expands into our online interactions and public environments. Digital inclusion focuses on ensuring everyone has equal access to technology and the skills to use it effectively.
For many people, digital literacy education is essential “to navigate and engage with digital technologies”. Without proper training, even the most advanced devices become inaccessible barriers rather than tools for connection. This primarily affects older adults, people with disabilities, and those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Simultaneously, public spaces play a crucial role in fostering inclusive communities. As one source points out, “Public spaces play a central role in the creation of inclusive communities and more specifically, in the formation of a public culture”.
Truly inclusive public spaces incorporate elements like:
At this point in our understanding, we can see that to explain the concept of inclusion in public and digital realms means addressing both physical access and social belonging. A city that fails to prioritize accessibility “has decided that disabled people do not have the same value or citizenship worth as those without disabilities”.
The meaning of inclusion in everyday spaces ultimately comes down to removing barriers that prevent full participation—whether in a classroom, workplace meeting, digital platform, or city park.
Many people hold oversimplified views about what inclusion truly entails. Unfortunately, these misconceptions can prevent organizations and communities from creating genuinely inclusive environments. Let me share three common misconceptions that completely changed my understanding of inclusion.
One of the biggest misunderstandings I’ve encountered is that inclusion simply means being kind to others. Although kindness is valuable, inclusion demands much more than pleasant interactions.
Being nice is often an individual action that doesn’t address underlying issues of discrimination and inequity. Inclusion, on the other hand, requires systemic change and concerted efforts to create environments where everyone feels valued and respected for who they truly are.
Think about it this way:
Kindness can certainly contribute to inclusion—studies show it can boost productivity, build trust, and create positive work cultures. Nonetheless, without addressing structural barriers and inequities, kindness alone cannot create inclusive environments.
Another prevalent misconception is treating diversity and inclusion as interchangeable concepts. I’ve visited many organizations that proudly showcase their diverse workforce yet fail to create truly inclusive cultures.
Diversity has become conflated with inclusion, as if simply having diverse representation is sufficient. In reality, diversity is merely a prerequisite for inclusion—it doesn’t guarantee it. Diversity focuses on representation while inclusion addresses how people are treated and work together.
Consider this stark reality: diversity without inclusion can actually cause harm. Recruiting people from marginalized backgrounds into spaces where they don’t feel safe, respected, or supported puts unfair burdens on them. This approach creates what experts call “tokenism” rather than genuine inclusion.
Research consistently demonstrates that organizations with inclusive cultures perform better, yet this isn’t automatic. You can have a diverse workforce that fails to perform if inclusion isn’t actively cultivated. The key insight here is that diversity represents potential, but inclusion unlocks that potential.
Perhaps the most damaging misconception I’ve encountered is viewing inclusion as a checkbox exercise—something you can complete and move on from. In my early career, I witnessed numerous organizations launch inclusion initiatives with great fanfare, only to see them fizzle out months later.
Becoming an inclusive organization or community is an ongoing process that takes time, effort, and commitment. It involves continuous learning, self-reflection, and improvement—a journey that never truly ends. Inclusive leadership requires a long-term commitment to creating a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Unlike one-time training programs or policy changes, inclusion demands persistent attention. According to research, fewer than 12% of companies include senior leaders in their inclusion and diversity goals, and 76% have no diversity or inclusion goals at all. This highlights how many organizations treat inclusion as an afterthought rather than an ongoing priority.
The reality is that true inclusion requires regularly evaluating policies, practices, and outcomes to identify areas where inclusivity can be strengthened. It means continuously addressing bias, systemic inequalities, and barriers to diversity and inclusion.
By recognizing and moving beyond these misconceptions, we can begin to understand what is meant by inclusion in its fullest sense—not just nice behavior, not just diversity, and certainly not a one-time effort, but an ongoing commitment to creating environments where everyone can thrive.
Creating truly inclusive environments requires overcoming powerful barriers that often operate invisibly within our systems and daily interactions. Even with the best intentions, these obstacles can undermine inclusion efforts and perpetuate exclusion for marginalized groups.
First and foremost, structural inequalities create fundamental barriers to inclusion by operating simultaneously at multiple levels. These inequalities are reproduced socially through interactions, culturally through values and representations, and institutionally through formal rules and informal norms. Subsequently, these systemic biases reinforce inequality by restricting career advancement, educational success, and social integration.
Indeed, examining systemic barriers reveals how deeply entrenched exclusion can be. For example, despite increasing numbers of female graduate students in certain STEM fields, these disciplines remain predominantly white and male at senior faculty levels. Women scientists, especially those with children, struggle more than men to embody the “ideal worker norm” due to entrenched gender roles in society.
The economic impact is substantial—organizations failing to address these barriers experience lower employee engagement, higher turnover rates, and diminished innovation. In contrast, environments that actively dismantle systemic barriers report improved productivity, morale, and institutional success.
Beyond this, physical and environmental barriers create significant obstacles for people with disabilities. The World Health Organization defines barriers as factors in a person’s environment that “limit functioning and create disability,” including inaccessible physical spaces and inadequate assistive technology.
For instance, consider a talented software engineer who uses a wheelchair but finds her office lacks accessible entrances and ergonomic workstations. Despite her skills, the physical inaccessibility creates an exclusionary environment limiting her ability to contribute effectively.
Notably, policy barriers often stem from inadequate awareness or enforcement of existing accessibility laws. These can include:
Social barriers further compound these issues. In 2017, only 35.5% of working-age people with disabilities were employed, compared to 76.5% of people without disabilities. Furthermore, adults with disabilities are more likely to have lower incomes (22.3% compared to 7.3% of those without disabilities).
Implicit biases—thoughts and feelings outside our conscious awareness—also present formidable barriers to inclusion. These unconscious bias and attitudes influence decisions without us realizing it. Research demonstrates this effect dramatically: resumes with white-sounding names were 50% more likely to receive interview callbacks than identical resumes with Black-sounding names.
Microaggressions represent another subtle yet harmful barrier, defined as “verbal, non-verbal and environmental slights, snubs and insults” targeting people based on their identity. Though often unintentional, these interactions communicate hostile messages that:
The cumulative impact of these small but frequent indignities is profound. Victims may begin to doubt themselves (“Did that really happen?” “Am I being oversensitive?”), a process known as gaslighting. Organizations where microaggressions go unchallenged often develop poor culture, bad practices, lack of progression for certain groups, high staff absence, and recruitment problems.
Understanding these barriers helps explain why true inclusion requires ongoing, deliberate effort rather than simple good intentions. Addressing these obstacles demands both individual awareness and systemic change.
Moving beyond theory, I’ve discovered that practical implementation reveals what inclusion truly means in action. Thereupon examining real-world examples, we can see how inclusion transforms from concept to reality.
Structured interviewing forms the backbone of inclusive hiring—asking all candidates the same questions in the same order, then scoring responses against consistent criteria. Organizations implementing this approach reduce the influence of unconscious bias dramatically. Besides structured interviews, inclusive hiring involves writing bias-free job descriptions, removing identifying information from applications, and making scheduling flexible.
Salary transparency primarily drives inclusion by leveling the playing field. Adding salary ranges to job postings and making them non-negotiable helps since marginalized groups are less likely to have insider information about compensation. Presently, companies with diverse leadership outperform peers by 36% in profitability, demonstrating the business case for inclusive practices.
Universal design creates environments, products, and services that work for everyone without adaptation. Unlike accommodation, which addresses individual needs after the fact, universal design integrates inclusivity from inception.
In education, this means developing flexible learning environments where information is presented multiple ways, students engage through varied approaches, and demonstrate learning through different options. Likewise, digital inclusion ensures everyone has equal access to technology and the skills to use it effectively.
Safe spaces embody psychological safety—the ability to speak up, take risks, or fail without fear of penalty. Accordingly, this means clearly stating non-negotiable ground rules for language, co-creating engagement rules with employees, and implementing zero-tolerance policies for harassment.
Belonging happens when overlooked individuals can make decisions, lead, and “feel like they can really bring their whole authentic selves”. It’s hearing “I believe in you. I see you. You’re going to do great” in trusted environments.
Amplifying marginalized voices isn’t optional—it’s essential. Research shows that individuals with marginalized identities often have their ideas disregarded or stolen. By prioritizing these perspectives, organizations gain valuable insights for improving processes and functions.
Organizations with high levels of inclusion and allyship report greater employee contentment, 56% improved performance, and up to 167% increase in positive feedback. Shortly put, inclusion requires passing the microphone to those typically silenced but not voiceless.
Inclusive spaces don’t happen accidentally. They require intentional design that accommodates diverse needs. As one expert beautifully framed it, inclusion means “I built this with you in mind. Let’s continue to build it together”.
My journey toward understanding true inclusion began with uncomfortable self-reflection. Before this transformation, I saw inclusion as something others needed to practice—not something that required my personal growth and awareness.
Initially, I didn’t recognize the unearned advantages I possessed. Privilege, I learned, consists of the positive advantages or absence of barriers given to specific groups due to their social position. These benefits seemed ordinary to me—not privileges at all but entitlements.
The breakthrough came during an exercise identifying different types of privilege I held. What struck me most was how these advantages felt completely normal from my perspective yet represented significant barriers for others. This realization fostered empathy and understanding toward those facing systemic obstacles I’d never encountered.
Throughout my journey, adopting a growth mindset became essential—recognizing that regardless of my background, I could develop greater knowledge and acceptance of different experiences. This meant acknowledging that access isn’t equal by default and that barriers exist, whether intentional or not.
One powerful lesson came from hearing firsthand accounts from disabled individuals who received limited career opportunities simply because of their differences. These stories revealed that what is meant by inclusion goes far beyond theoretical concepts—it’s about real lives and opportunities.
Ultimately, I realized that simply acknowledging privilege wasn’t enough. The meaning of inclusion requires action—using advantages to benefit those around me. As the saying goes, “If you are more fortunate than others, build a longer table, not a taller fence”.
This manifests in small yet significant ways: advocating for colleagues from underrepresented groups, ensuring accessibility in spaces I control, and consistently examining how my behaviors might create barriers for others. True inclusion, I discovered, means embedding inclusive practices and values into everyday actions—making it not just what we do occasionally but who we are consistently.
The journey to understanding what inclusion truly means has transformed not just my knowledge but my entire worldview. Previously, I viewed inclusion as simply allowing everyone to participate – a surface-level understanding that missed its profound significance. Undoubtedly, inclusion represents something much deeper: a fundamental human right that creates environments where everyone feels valued, respected, and able to contribute fully.
Throughout this exploration, we’ve seen how inclusion transcends diversity. While diversity focuses on representation, inclusion addresses how people experience belonging within a community. Furthermore, true inclusion manifests differently across various settings – from classrooms where all children learn side-by-side to workplaces where every voice carries equal weight.
Perhaps most importantly, I’ve learned that inclusion demands ongoing commitment rather than one-time initiatives. The barriers preventing inclusion – systemic biases, lack of accessibility, unconscious prejudices – require persistent attention and action. Additionally, inclusion involves acknowledging privilege and using that awareness to create more equitable spaces for everyone.
My perspective shift reflects what happens when we move beyond viewing inclusion as someone else’s responsibility. Instead, I now recognize it as a personal commitment to creating environments where differences are not merely tolerated but celebrated. The meaning of inclusion, after all, lies not just in understanding the concept intellectually but in practicing it daily through small yet significant actions.
The next time you encounter the term “inclusion,” remember that it represents more than a buzzword or policy requirement. It embodies a vision of society where everyone belongs, contributes, and thrives regardless of their background or identity. This vision, when realized, benefits not just marginalized individuals but enriches our collective experience through the power of diverse perspectives and shared humanity.
Understanding true inclusion goes beyond simple representation—it’s about creating environments where everyone feels valued, respected, and empowered to contribute their authentic selves.
• Inclusion differs from diversity: diversity is the “what” (representation), while inclusion is the “how” (creating belonging and equal participation)
• True inclusion requires ongoing commitment, not one-time initiatives—it demands continuous effort to dismantle systemic barriers and unconscious biases
• Practical inclusion involves structured hiring practices, universal design principles, amplifying marginalized voices, and creating psychologically safe spaces
• Personal responsibility matters: recognizing your own privilege and taking active steps to create more equitable environments for others
• Inclusion benefits everyone: organizations with inclusive cultures see 36% higher profitability and improved innovation through diverse perspectives
The journey toward inclusion starts with self-reflection and evolves into daily actions that make spaces more accessible and welcoming for all identities and backgrounds.
While diversity refers to the presence of different groups, inclusion is about creating an environment where all individuals feel valued and can participate fully. Diversity focuses on representation, while inclusion addresses how people are treated and integrated within a group or organization.
Workplaces can become more inclusive by implementing structured hiring practices, promoting salary transparency, creating safe spaces for all identities, actively listening to marginalized voices, and fostering a culture where everyone feels respected and empowered to contribute their authentic selves.
Common barriers to inclusion include systemic and institutional biases, lack of accessibility and accommodations, unconscious biases, and microaggressions. These obstacles can prevent full participation and equal opportunities for marginalized groups in various settings.
Inclusion benefits organizations by improving productivity, innovation, and profitability. Companies with diverse and inclusive leadership outperform their peers. In society, inclusion promotes equal opportunities, reduces discrimination, and enhances overall well-being by allowing everyone to contribute their unique perspectives and talents.
Taking personal responsibility for inclusion involves recognizing one’s own privileges, learning from others’ lived experiences, and actively working to create more equitable spaces. It means consistently examining how our behaviors might create barriers for others and taking deliberate actions to promote inclusivity in our daily lives and interactions.
Curious about more HR buzzwords like Employee Assistance Programs (EAP), boomerang employee, 360 degree feedback, or HR Consulting? Dive into our HR Glossary and get clear definitions of the terms that drive modern HR.
Explore Taggd for RPO solutions.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |