Staying on top of the latest HR terms and jargon can be a challenge in your field of expertise. We understand as an HR professional you’re always looking to expand your skills and knowledge, which is why we’ve compiled an extensive HR glossary.
The glossary is your go-to resource to help sharpen your acumen in this field. From commonly used HR words to more obscure Human Resources terms, the HR glossary covers it all. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, our library is a handy tool to have in your arsenal.
Home » HR Glossary » Group Dynamics
Group dynamics shapes every team interaction we experience, whether we’re consciously aware of it or not. As team leaders, understanding the behaviors and psychological processes occurring within our social groups can dramatically impact our effectiveness and results. Indeed, group dynamics refers to the individual behaviors, skills, and attitudes of members within a group, all driven by a common identity and shared objectives.
Furthermore, the importance of group dynamics cannot be overstated when leading teams toward success. When we examine the types of group dynamics at play, we discover that “the greater the loyalty of a group towards the group, the greater is the motivation among the members to achieve the goals”. This principle underlies the characteristics of group dynamics that make it such a powerful force in team settings.
Additionally, researchers have observed that groups typically progress through five development stages before reaching their maximum potential, a framework that has become fundamental to the principles of group dynamics. If managed effectively, these dynamics contribute significantly to organizational goals, making them essential knowledge for any team leader looking ahead to 2025.
The invisible forces that shape our teams are more powerful than most leaders realize. In every workplace interaction, group dynamics silently influence how decisions are made, conflicts are resolved, and goals are achieved.
Let’s explore what these dynamics really are and why they’re crucial for team success in today’s rapidly evolving work environment.
Group dynamics refers to the psychological processes and work behaviors that occur within social groups or between different groups at workplace or otherwise. This concept encompasses how individuals interact, communicate, and influence each other when working collectively toward shared objectives.
Group dynamics isn’t just about putting people together—it’s about understanding the complex interplay of relationships, attitudes, and behaviors that emerge when individuals form a collective identity. As social psychologist Kurt Lewin, who coined the term in the 1940s, discovered, these dynamics don’t appear randomly—they develop through the way people perceive themselves in relation to their peers.
It’s essential to distinguish between group dynamics and team dynamics. While related, they represent different organizational structures:
The foundation of group dynamics lies in a fundamental premise: “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”. When people form a group, their collective behavior creates something that transcends individual contributions. Research has demonstrated that high-performing teams communicate up to 12 times more frequently than low-performing ones, highlighting how vital these interpersonal connections are.
In essence, group dynamics study reveals how our behavior changes in group settings compared to when we’re alone. It helps explain the formation of group norms, leadership struggles, and the power of peer pressure.
In today’s complex work environment, understanding group dynamics has become critical for organizational success. As we navigate 2025’s challenges, several factors make these dynamics particularly relevant.
First, the nature of work has evolved dramatically. Over 80% of youth participants now take part in team-oriented activities, and even “individual” pursuits often occur in highly interdependent settings. This trend toward collaboration makes group dynamics central to how work gets accomplished.
Moreover, positive group dynamics directly impact productivity and innovation. When team members trust and respect each other, they collaborate more effectively, leading to increased productivity through shared ideas, resources, and workloads. Consequently, groups with healthy dynamics typically make better decisions than individuals working alone, drawing on collective knowledge and expertise.
In contrast, negative dynamics can devastate workplace performance. Poor group interactions create confusion, diminish productivity, and accelerate employee turnover rate. These effects are particularly pronounced in our increasingly remote and hybrid work environments, where traditional dynamics have been transformed.
Group dynamics also significantly influence employee engagement and retention. When individuals feel valued within their group, they demonstrate greater motivation and commitment. This emotional connection often reduces labor turnover as members develop attachments to their colleagues.
Another reason group dynamics matters more than ever is the growing recognition of its role in addressing complex organizational challenges. Effective group interaction brings respect to different perspectives, promoting excellent morale while achieving collective goals. This inclusive approach has become essential in diverse, global workplaces.
The evolution toward virtual and hybrid teams presents both challenges and opportunities for group dynamics. These new arrangements require different skills and strategies to foster effective collaboration. Nevertheless, by understanding and nurturing positive group dynamics, organizations can create environments where all team members contribute and thrive, regardless of physical location.
Ultimately, as leaders in 2025, our ability to harness group dynamics will determine how successfully our teams navigate complexity, foster innovation, and achieve their potential. By recognizing these invisible forces and learning to work with them rather than against them, we can create the conditions for truly exceptional team performance.
The theoretical foundation of how teams function has evolved dramatically over the past century. This scientific journey reveals why teams behave as they do and provides us with practical frameworks for understanding our own groups.
The study of group dynamics originated from a powerful insight: a group possesses qualities that cannot be understood by merely studying its individual members. This premise that “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts” has remained consistent throughout the field’s development.
Initially, the roots of group dynamics spread across both psychology and sociology. Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920), considered the founder of experimental psychology, recognized that communities exhibited phenomena like language, customs, and religion that individual study couldn’t fully explain. Concurrently, sociologist Émile Durkheim (1858-1917) identified collective phenomena such as public knowledge.
Gustave Le Bon emerged as an early influential theorist with his 1896 work “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind,” which examined collective behavior. Le Bon believed crowds possessed a “racial unconscious” with primitive and antisocial instincts. Shortly thereafter, William McDougall proposed the concept of a “group mind” that existed beyond individual interactions.
The field transformed substantially when Kurt Lewin coined the term “group dynamics” to describe positive and negative forces within groups. Primarily focused on applying group dynamics to real-world social issues, Lewin established the Group Dynamics Research Center at MIT in 1945—the first institute dedicated exclusively to studying this phenomenon. His approach emphasized that theoretical and applied research should progress hand-in-hand.
Perhaps the most enduring contribution to group dynamics theory came in 1965 when Bruce Tuckman introduced his four-stage model of group development. Based on observations of group behavior across various settings, Tuckman identified a predictable sequence: forming, storming, norming, and performing. Later, he added a fifth stage—adjourning.
During forming, members are polite but focused on themselves, seeking guidance and establishing boundaries. Storming follows as power structures emerge and conflicts arise. In the norming stage, members resolve differences and build trust, though they may avoid controversy to maintain harmony. Performing represents peak productivity, with members working autonomously toward shared goals. Finally, adjourning involves task completion and group dissolution.
Despite being sequential in theory, research shows groups often move recursively through these stages. A team might be successfully performing until a new member arrives, pushing them back into storming. Effective leaders anticipate these transitions and help teams progress toward performing as quickly as possible.
The theoretical understanding of group dynamics has continued to evolve beyond Tuckman’s linear model. Joy Karriker notably found that group life is more dynamic and cyclical than previously thought. This perspective draws from Connie Gersick’s concept of punctuated equilibrium, which suggests groups maintain relative stability for extended periods, interrupted by brief bursts of revolutionary change.
Through this lens, groups can repeatedly cycle between storming and performing stages, with transformative change occurring during short transitional windows. For organizations that understand disruption and conflict as inevitable, these moments represent opportunities for innovation rather than failures.
Modern approaches essentially recognize that group dynamics affect virtually every aspect of organizational life. Over 80% of youth participants now engage in team-oriented activities, and even seemingly individual pursuits frequently occur in settings characterized by high interdependence. In these contexts, understanding how groups function becomes increasingly vital for leadership success.
The evolutionary psychology perspective has furthermore enriched our understanding of group cooperation. Researchers now examine how honest signals of commitment (like initiation rites) help prevent free-riding and enhance group cohesion—insights that continue to expand the theoretical foundations of this essential field.
Every social unit within an organization falls into distinct categories, each with unique characteristics that shape interactions. Understanding these classifications helps team leaders recognize patterns and effectively manage group behaviors in diverse contexts.
The primary classification of groups centers around their establishment method and structure. Formal groups are deliberately created by organizational management to achieve specific objectives. These groups operate with defined roles, clear hierarchies, and established rules to ensure efficiency and goal attainment. In contrast, informal groups emerge spontaneously through social interactions among employees, based on common interests, friendships, or shared experiences without management intervention.
Formal groups typically include:
Informal groups, however, develop naturally and include:
The structure of formal groups is typically hierarchical, whereas informal groups lack rigid structure. Formal groups focus primarily on professional relationships oriented toward organizational goals, whereas informal ones foster personal connections where members share opinions, experiences, and information freely.
Another important categorization distinguishes groups based on their duration and purpose. Task groups are temporary teams assembled to complete specific projects or assignments. Once their objectives are achieved, these groups typically disband. For instance, an ad hoc committee investigating a workplace issue or a project team developing a new product would qualify as task groups.
Functional groups, conversely, are permanent entities supporting routine operations. They continue existing after achieving current goals and tackle recurring organizational issues. Examples include marketing departments, customer service teams, or accounting divisions that handle ongoing business functions.
The key differences between these types involve:
Groups also differ based on their formation process. Spontaneous groups emerge suddenly without prior planning. Audiences at concerts, sports spectators, or flash mobs exemplify this category. These groups typically lack internal structure and form naturally around shared momentary experiences.
Alternatively, organized groups result from careful planning and deliberate formation for specific purposes. They have designated leaders and structured hierarchies that maintain unity and integrity. Schools, families, and military units represent classic examples of organized groups.
According to Mayo and Lombard, organized groups feature designated leaders who maintain the group’s unity through skills and intelligence. Furthermore, they identified additional classifications including:
Identifying these group types enables leaders to anticipate behaviors, manage interactions effectively, and guide teams toward optimal performance through appropriate leadership strategies tailored to each group’s unique dynamics.
Team development follows a predictable path that every effective leader must recognize and navigate. Originally identified by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965, these five stages—forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning—reveal how groups transform from collections of individuals into cohesive units. Understanding this evolutionary process helps team leaders anticipate challenges and guide their teams toward peak performance.
Forming
The journey begins with the forming stage, where uncertainty reigns as team members first come together. During this initial phase, individuals are primarily concerned with being accepted while simultaneously trying to understand their roles and responsibilities. Productivity typically remains low as members focus on orientation rather than task accomplishment. Team members often appear polite and cautious, exhibiting their “best behavior” while internally focused on personal concerns.
At this point, the team leader plays a crucial role in establishing ground rules and providing clear direction. Members frequently ask questions and look to leadership for guidance as they navigate unfamiliar territory. This orientation process cannot be rushed—it must occur naturally as team members become acquainted with one another.
Storming
As the honeymoon period ends, teams enter the storming stage—a turbulent phase characterized by conflict and competition. Individual personalities emerge more strongly, often leading to power struggles and disagreements about team goals and approaches. Team performance may temporarily decrease as energy diverts toward these interpersonal conflicts.
Team members begin testing boundaries, challenging authority, and questioning the team’s purpose or methods. This friction, although uncomfortable, serves an important purpose—it helps the team develop conflict resolution skills that strengthen overall effectiveness. Failure to address these conflicts can result in long-term problems, sometimes preventing teams from progressing further.
Norming
Once conflicts begin resolving, the team transitions to the norming stage, where consensus develops around leadership, roles, and expectations. This third phase marks when “things begin to settle down” as team cohesion increases and interpersonal differences are reconciled.
In time, members demonstrate greater comfort asking for help and offering constructive feedback. A stronger commitment to team goals emerges alongside increased motivation. However, this harmony remains fragile—teams can easily revert to storming if new disagreements arise. Some teams may become so focused on maintaining harmony that they avoid controversy altogether, potentially limiting innovation.
Performing
The performing stage represents the team at its peak potential. Group members now follow established workflows efficiently, demonstrating autonomy and fluidity in their roles. Decision-making becomes more distributed, and the team requires minimal supervision. Members accept each other holistically, appreciating individual differences rather than seeing them as obstacles.
During this phase, the team makes significant progress toward its goals with high levels of commitment and competence. Problems and conflicts still emerge occasionally but are handled constructively through established processes. The team functions as a cohesive unit, often achieving results that exceed expectations.
Adjourning
The final stage—adjourning (sometimes called “mourning”)—occurs when the team completes its mission or disbands. Added to Tuckman’s model in 1977, this phase acknowledges the psychological importance of closure. Team members may experience mixed emotions, including satisfaction with accomplishments alongside sadness about the team’s dissolution.
The adjourning stage provides an opportunity for reflection, celebration, and knowledge transfer. Leaders should recognize individual contributions and team successes while facilitating transition to new projects or roles. This ceremonial acknowledgment helps provide closure and honors the team’s legacy.
Understanding these five stages enables team leaders to anticipate challenges, manage transitions effectively, and accelerate their team’s journey toward high performance. Although presented sequentially, teams often move recursively through these stages as circumstances change or new members join.
“Strong and cohesive teams thrive when leaders highlight how much they all have in common, not how much he or she stands above from the crowd.” — Moira Alexander, Founder, Lead-Her-Ship Group; Project management thought leader
Behind every successful team lies a set of fundamental principles that govern how members interact and achieve results together. These core principles act as the invisible architecture upon which effective group dynamics are built, giving teams their unique character and driving their success.
The cornerstone of group dynamics is interdependence—the extent to which team members rely on each other for the team’s functioning. In effective teams, members understand that their success is intertwined with the success of others. This interdependence naturally creates responsibility, shared accountability, and motivation among members.
Shared goals serve as the guiding light for team members, aligning efforts and directing actions toward common objectives. The principle of common motives underscores this dynamic—a team forms and binds together around shared aims. As team members rally around a mutual purpose, they experience:
The goal orientation principle establishes that groups survive and thrive only when their actions are purposefully directed. Thus, when members align on these objectives, they feel psychologically safe, which increases their confidence to share ideas and contribute meaningfully.
Groups operate on norms—acceptable standards of behavior that are shared by members. These norms, either explicit or implicit, determine how people interact, make decisions, deal with conflict, and fulfill responsibilities.
During the norming stage of group development, teams establish these common expectations that guide member behavior. Four common classes of norms include:
The Hawthorne Studies conclusively demonstrated that group norms were highly effective in establishing individual worker output—often more influential than monetary compensation. Furthermore, conformity represents another critical principle wherein members adjust their behavior to align with these norms.
Roles similarly structure group dynamics by specifying expected behavior patterns attributed to individuals occupying given positions. These roles come with:
When roles are clearly defined, it minimizes overlap, confusion, and frustration among team members. This clarity establishes accountability because it clarifies what’s expected from individuals.
Communication is undeniably the lifeblood of any group, serving as one of the most influential factors shaping how a team functions. No matter how skilled the members are, a team will underperform without proper communication channels.
Effective communication in groups serves multiple critical functions:
Within teams, communication establishes trust and respect among members, which strengthens their bonds. Clear communication ensures members understand expectations and perspectives, minimizing misunderstandings and allowing issues to be addressed early.
Feedback loops represent an essential component of group communication that helps improve performance and foster personal growth. When team members receive feedback on their work, they can identify areas for improvement and take steps to address them, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
Consequently, a culture of open and active feedback promotes several benefits:
Importantly, when feedback is delivered positively and respectfully, it helps individuals feel valued and encourages more active contribution to the team’s success. This process transforms group dynamics from a theoretical concept into a practical tool for enhancing team performance.
“The success of a team depends less on individual brilliance and more on effective communication.” — Simon Sinek, Leadership expert and author of ‘Start With Why’
The structural framework of a team directly influences its operational effectiveness. As teams evolve, the organization of member responsibilities and interaction patterns creates a performance architecture that can either elevate or diminish results.
Clear role definition fundamentally shapes how effectively teams function. When team members understand their specific responsibilities, workplace tension decreases markedly while proper workflow maintains its momentum. This clarity enables individuals to concentrate on utilizing their unique skills without unnecessary overlap or confusion.
In high-functioning teams, roles frequently include leaders who guide vision, facilitators who ensure smooth communication, innovators who challenge established thinking, and implementers who transform concepts into action. The devil’s advocate role serves as a particularly vital function by reducing groupthink and offering alternative perspectives that enhance decision quality.
As a result, when responsibilities are explicitly communicated before project initiation, members can focus on their assigned tasks while understanding how their work contributes to collective objectives. This role clarity establishes accountability by defining what’s expected from each individual, subsequently minimizing redundancies and ensuring comprehensive coverage of all necessary functions.
The connection between team cohesion and performance operates through complex mechanisms. Group cohesion—the bond uniting individuals to work harmoniously—significantly impacts productivity through several channels:
Research regarding morale-productivity relationships reveals interesting patterns. One study by the National Institute of Industrial Psychology found that in 52% of cases, high morale corresponded with high productivity, in 13% of cases, high morale accompanied low productivity, and in 35% of cases, no clear relationship emerged. This suggests the morale-performance connection isn’t always straightforward.
Team cohesion specifically strengthens performance in situations where consequences are far-reaching and tasks demand more interaction. In medical emergency teams, for instance, cohesion significantly impacts decision-making under time pressure.
Effective decision-making processes represent essential components of successful team performance. In reality, group decision-making rarely follows the idealized linear path many expect. Instead, effective teams recognize that misunderstanding and miscommunication constitute normal aspects of participatory decision-making.
Conflict, although inevitable, need not diminish team effectiveness. When managed properly, disagreements can actually strengthen teams by promoting innovation and identifying potential pitfalls. Skillful conflict resolution typically involves keeping communication open through face-to-face meetings, listening empathetically to all perspectives, focusing on problems rather than individuals, and developing actionable resolution plans.
Ultimately, successful conflict management builds psychological safety where team members feel comfortable expressing dissenting views without fear of negative consequences. This environment fosters better decisions by incorporating diverse perspectives while simultaneously reinforcing the cohesion that drives sustained performance excellence.
Individuals rarely behave the same way in groups as they do alone. Our psychology fundamentally shifts when we operate as part of a collective, creating fascinating behavioral patterns that every team leader should understand.
Originally observed by Norman Triplett in 1898, social facilitation refers to the tendency to perform better on simple or well-learned tasks when others are present. Triplett noticed cyclists rode faster when racing against others compared to racing alone against the clock. On the other hand, social inhibition occurs when performance worsens in the presence of others, typically on complex or unfamiliar tasks.
Robert Zajonc explained this phenomenon through his drive theory, proposing that others’ presence increases arousal, which enhances dominant responses. If the dominant response is correct (as in simple tasks), performance improves; if incorrect (as in complex tasks), performance suffers. Remarkably, this effect extends beyond humans—cockroaches ran faster on straight runways but slower on difficult mazes when observed by other cockroaches.
In group settings, we typically conform to established norms, often adjusting our behavior to match others’. This powerful impulse likely evolved from our ancestral need for tribal protection. One famous study found approximately 75% of participants agreed with an obviously wrong answer at least once when everyone else in the group chose it.
Groupthink emerges when teams prioritize consensus over critical thinking. Irving Janis identified eight symptoms of groupthink, including illusions of invulnerability, self-censorship, and pressure on dissenters. The consequences can be severe—from poor decision-making to suppressed innovation and creativity. Historically, groupthink has been blamed for major failures like the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Challenger disaster.
Interestingly, groups often judge deviant members more harshly than similar-behaving outsiders. This “black sheep effect” occurs primarily with moral transgressions and is driven by concerns regarding group social cohesion. From a social functionalist perspective, this harsh judgment serves to maintain group norms and protect collective identity.
Understanding these influences helps team leaders recognize when individual behavior reflects personal traits versus group pressures.
Even the most cohesive teams encounter stubborn challenges that can derail productivity and morale. Understanding these pitfalls helps leaders navigate complex group interactions more effectively.
Ironically, a team’s greatest strength can become its biggest weakness. When groups establish strong norms and cohesion, they naturally resist alterations to protect their identity. This resistance isn’t merely obstinacy—it represents a normal emotional response to uncertainty. Highly cohesive groups might reject new processes or team structures that threaten established patterns, ultimately hampering innovation.
Power dynamics inevitably emerge within teams as members compete for finite resources like information, recognition, or influence. These struggles can spread rapidly throughout a team, creating a psychologically unsafe environment. Correspondingly, role ambiguity—when employees lack clear expectations about their responsibilities—leads to increased stress, poor performance, and decreased organizational efficiency. Studies indicate that role ambiguity directly contributes to emotional exhaustion, characterized by chronic fatigue and depleted energy.
Finding equilibrium between personal aspirations and collective objectives remains a perpetual challenge. Individual goals reflect personal values and strengths, whereas team goals align with shared mission and objectives. Unfortunately, these sometimes clash, generating conflict or resentment. Successful teams recognize that encouraging individual growth fosters greater commitment to collective goals. In essence, when team members feel valued in their personal pursuits, they invest more wholeheartedly in organizational objectives.
Understanding group dynamics fundamentally transforms how we lead teams. Throughout this exploration, we’ve seen that effective leadership requires much more than assigning tasks—it demands awareness of the invisible psychological forces at work whenever people collaborate.
Teams operate as living organisms, changing and evolving through predictable stages while responding to both internal and external pressures. This knowledge gives us power. When we recognize our team is in the storming phase, for instance, we can address conflicts constructively rather than seeing them as signs of failure.
Different types of groups require different leadership approaches. A formal task force needs clear direction and timelines, whereas informal groups benefit from a lighter touch that preserves their natural cohesion. Additionally, the five-stage development model provides a roadmap for anticipating challenges before they arise.
Group dynamics significantly impacts individual behavior. People perform differently when observed by others, conform to group expectations, and judge deviants harshly. These patterns happen whether we acknowledge them or not, therefore awareness allows us to harness these forces productively.
Communication undeniably forms the backbone of healthy group dynamics. Teams that communicate frequently and honestly build trust, resolve conflicts effectively, and make better decisions. Consequently, creating psychological safety where members feel comfortable expressing dissenting views prevents groupthink while fostering innovation.
Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, the ability to navigate group dynamics will become even more crucial as teams become increasingly diverse, virtual, and fluid. The leaders who thrive will be those who understand both the science and art of group dynamics—recognizing patterns, addressing challenges proactively, and creating environments where teams can reach their performing stage quickly.
Though perfect group dynamics might seem elusive, the principles outlined here offer practical guidance for any team situation. After all, leadership success ultimately depends less on individual brilliance and more on our ability to bring out the best in our teams through thoughtful attention to the forces that shape group behavior.
Understanding group dynamics is essential for team leaders navigating the complex interpersonal forces that determine team success or failure in modern workplaces.
• Teams progress through five predictable stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning—anticipate conflicts during storming to guide teams toward peak performance faster.
• Clear roles and open communication prevent most team dysfunction: Define responsibilities explicitly and create psychological safety where members can express dissenting views without fear.
• Individual behavior changes dramatically in group settings: People conform to norms, perform differently when observed, and judge team deviants more harshly than outsiders.
• Balance cohesion with adaptability: While team unity drives performance, over-cohesion can create resistance to change and stifle innovation.
• Interdependence and shared goals form the foundation: Teams succeed when members understand their mutual reliance and align around common objectives that transcend individual interests.
The key to exceptional team leadership lies not in managing individuals, but in understanding and harnessing the invisible psychological forces that emerge when people work together toward shared goals.
Successful team dynamics are built on psychological safety, clear roles and responsibilities, open communication, shared goals, and the ability to adapt. Teams that excel in these areas tend to be more innovative, productive, and resilient in the face of challenges.
Group dynamics significantly impact individual behavior through phenomena like social facilitation, conformity, and the black sheep effect. People may perform differently when observed by others, align with group norms, and judge team deviants more harshly than outsiders.
The five stages of group development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Understanding these stages helps leaders anticipate challenges, manage transitions effectively, and guide their teams toward peak performance more quickly.
Leaders can balance cohesion and innovation by fostering psychological safety, encouraging diverse perspectives, and creating a culture that values both unity and adaptability. It’s crucial to recognize when over-cohesion might be stifling creativity and take steps to introduce new ideas or processes.
Communication is the lifeblood of effective group dynamics. It establishes trust, facilitates conflict resolution, ensures clear understanding of roles and goals, and enables feedback loops for continuous improvement. Teams that communicate openly and frequently tend to perform better and adapt more easily to challenges.
Curious about more HR buzzwords like crisis management, data driven recruitment, or diversity hiring? Dive into our HR Glossary and get clear definitions of the terms that drive modern HR.
Explore Taggd for RPO solutions.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |