Staying on top of the latest HR terms and jargon can be a challenge in your field of expertise. We understand as an HR professional you’re always looking to expand your skills and knowledge, which is why we’ve compiled an extensive HR glossary.
The glossary is your go-to resource to help sharpen your acumen in this field. From commonly used HR words to more obscure Human Resources terms, the HR glossary covers it all. Whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, our library is a handy tool to have in your arsenal.
Home » HR Glossary » Informal Organization
Informal organization is a network of personal and social relationships that spontaneously emerge among employees within a formal organizational structure. Unlike formal structures, these relationships aren’t officially sanctioned or deliberately created by management, yet they significantly influence employee behavior, communication, and decision-making. DC Miller and William H Form define informal organizations as “networks of personal and social relationships that aren’t defined by formal structures”.
The informal organization functions as the interlocking social structure governing how people work together in practice. It comprises an aggregate of norms, personal and professional connections through which work gets done and relationships develop among individuals who share common organizational affiliations. These networks evolve organically as employees interact to satisfy their social and psychological needs that the formal structure might not fulfill.
According to Chester Barnard, “an informal organization is an aggregate of interpersonal relationships without any conscious purpose but which may contribute to joint results”. Similarly, Schein notes that an informal organization exists without legal boundaries, membership rosters, tangible assets, formal structure, or official leadership.
Key characteristics of informal organizations include:
Studies on organizational behavior indicate that more than 70% of workplace communication occurs via unofficial channels, underscoring the informal organization’s importance to daily operations. Communication flows more rapidly in informal structures because it doesn’t follow a chain of command, enabling information to travel across departmental boundaries and hierarchical levels.
For example, in a mid-sized accounting company, staff members from HR, finance, and audit departments might routinely meet for lunch, discuss work issues, and assist one another with activities outside their official responsibilities. This unofficial support network enhances morale, accelerates communication, and benefits the formal company by addressing minor issues without official intervention.
Informal organizations primarily develop to fulfill the social and emotional needs of employees. They enable workers to connect emotionally, build friendships, and satisfy their fundamental need to socialize. Furthermore, these structures help employees collaborate more effectively and achieve organizational goals faster through stronger peer connections.
Despite lacking formal rules or procedures, informal organizations exist in every business environment. They typically run parallel to formal organizations, complementing their explicit structures, plans, and processes. When managed effectively, informal organizations can enhance responses to unanticipated events, foster innovation, and create pathways that indicate where formal structures may eventually need development.
However, informal organizations can sometimes work against achieving formal organizational goals if they form cliques or opposing groups. The contemporary management approach recognizes both the strengths and limitations of informal organizations, seeking to integrate them with formal structures rather than viewing them as insufficient organizational byproducts.
Informal organizations manifest in various structural patterns across the workplace, each serving distinct social and professional needs. These natural groupings form in response to employees’ social requirements beyond their primary job functions.
Interest groups consist of individuals who come together based on shared hobbies, activities, or common interests. These associations develop naturally as employees discover mutual passions outside their immediate work responsibilities. For instance, book clubs within an organization allow literature enthusiasts to connect across departmental boundaries. Additionally, cause-based interest groups unite employees supporting specific beliefs or social initiatives. Sports clubs represent yet another common example, where employees participate in team activities that foster camaraderie beyond professional interactions. Interest groups typically form horizontally across departments, creating connections that might not otherwise exist within the formal structure.
Friendship groups emerge from personal relationships and mutual interactions among employees who develop close bonds. These groups often extend beyond the workplace into social settings, with colleagues attending movie nights, dinners, or other recreational activities together. The formation of workplace friendships yields substantial benefits, as research indicates that organizations creating space for such connections experience significant performance improvements and enhanced employee well-being. Interestingly, studies show that approximately 30% of North Americans report having a “best friend” at work, while many more maintain various friendship levels with colleagues. These relationships foster psychological safety, vulnerability, and compassion—elements crucial for innovation and job satisfaction.
Horizontal organizational structure comprises employees working at identical hierarchical levels within a company. Members of horizontal groups share similar problems, concerns, and professional interests. These formations promote information sharing and mutual support, enabling members to solve problems internally without involving supervisors.
Conversely, vertical groups consist of individuals from different authority levels who establish relationships across hierarchical boundaries. Such connections develop through skip-level relationships—for example, junior employees forming bonds with senior managers based on mutual respect or shared interests. Vertical groups enhance organizational communication channels and provide quicker access to emerging issues, creating pathways that bypass traditional communication chains.
Mixed groups incorporate individuals from various departments and hierarchical levels who connect through common personal interests, social activities, or practical arrangements.
Examples include carpooling groups, gym partners, or club memberships that bring together diverse organizational members. These cross-functional relationships create valuable connections that span departmental silos. For instance, a sales department president might develop an informal relationship with a technology director based on shared interests outside work. Mixed groups foster broader interactions across the organization, creating networks that might not develop through formal channels alone. These diverse connections often lead to innovative collaborations that benefit the organization by facilitating knowledge exchange across traditional boundaries.
The influence of informal organizations extends deeply into workplace culture, shaping organizational values, behaviors, and effectiveness beyond their structural dimensions. Studies indicate that nearly 80% of communication within organizations occurs through informal networks, fundamentally altering how decisions are made and collaboration takes place throughout the company.
Informal organizations act as powerful conduits for cultural transmission, conveying values, norms, and beliefs among employees. The tone and content of communication flowing through these networks directly affects employee morale, job satisfaction, and overall perception of the organization. Consequently, when employees feel connected through personal relationships, they demonstrate higher engagement with both their work and the company’s objectives.
Research from McKinsey reveals that 72% of employees report greater engagement when able to connect with peers informally, highlighting the critical role these networks play in fostering positive workplace environments. Moreover, studies from IBM suggest that teams utilizing their informal networks complete projects 25% faster while experiencing a 30% increase in overall satisfaction and morale.
Informal organizations serve as essential channels for knowledge transfer, especially where formal training programs may be insufficient. Through casual interactions, employees share expertise, solve problems collectively, and develop innovative approaches to challenges. This process occurs primarily because informal networks break down departmental silos, fostering cross-functional cooperation that might otherwise be hindered by formal structures.
The social fabric of informal organizations substantially impacts employee well-being. These networks provide emotional support, encouragement from peers, and opportunities to build meaningful workplace relationships. Within companies where climate is perceived positively, employee satisfaction rates reach approximately 86%, correlating directly with successful adaptation to organizational changes. Specifically, organizations characterized by supportive atmospheres often witness a 30% increase in employee productivity during periods of change.
Informal organizations function as cushions protecting employees from rigid formal structures while satisfying their need for psychological safety. They create spaces for social interactions that boost friendships, camaraderie, and belonging. This social dimension helps construct strong interpersonal connections that enhance organizational cohesion.
Nevertheless, informal networks present certain challenges to workplace culture. Occasionally, these structures may undermine formal authority or create conflicting interests. Not everyone is necessarily included in informal groups, potentially leading to feelings of exclusion or division among staff members. Additionally, informal organizations sometimes resist changes that disrupt established norms, making implementation of new policies particularly challenging.
Companies that recognize and effectively manage informal networks gain substantial advantages. Organizations with vibrant informal networks report a 25% increase in productivity. Furthermore, workplaces characterized by positive climate experience a 21% increase in profitability alongside reduction in turnover rates by up to 25%.
The informal organization ultimately determines the “why” behind employee behaviors, whereas formal structures dictate the “what” and “how”. This emotional and motivational foundation proves essential for encouraging creativity, inclusion, and open communication—elements that substantially enhance the organization’s ability to adapt, innovate, and thrive in contemporary business environments.
The distinction between formal and informal organizations represents a fundamental aspect of organizational structure, with each type serving complementary yet different functions within the business environment.
Formal organizations are deliberately created structures with specific goals and objectives, functioning through established hierarchies and clearly defined roles. In contrast, informal organizations emerge spontaneously based on social interactions and personal relationships that develop naturally among employees. Although they coexist within the same business setting, they differ substantially in their purpose, structure, and operational mechanisms.
The purpose of formal organizations is primarily goal-oriented, focusing on achieving specific business objectives through structured processes. These organizations operate as well-oiled machines where each component has a defined function within an ordered structure. Informal organizations, alternatively, concentrate on fulfilling social and psychological needs of employees, fostering creativity, motivation, and job satisfaction through social relations and flexibility.
Key Differences Between Formal and Informal Organizations:
Aspect | Formal Organization | Informal Organization |
---|---|---|
Creation | Deliberately established by management | Emerges spontaneously among members |
Structure | Defined hierarchical structure | Lacks formal hierarchy; more fluid |
Authority | Clear delegation of authority and responsibility | Informal power dynamics without clear accountability |
Communication | Follows predefined channels and protocols | Relies on informal, spontaneous communication |
Decision-making | Structured process following established rules | Less structured, often consensus-based |
Rules | Adheres to established procedures | Typically lacks formal rules; more flexible |
Focus | Work performance and task completion | Interpersonal relationships and social needs |
Stability | Stable and endures for extended periods | Dynamic and constantly evolving |
Regarding communication patterns, formal organizations utilize official communication channels following predetermined protocols, whereas informal organizations facilitate rapid information sharing through spontaneous interactions. This distinction allows informal networks to bypass formal channels for time-sensitive information, enabling real-time problem-solving and decision-making.
Authority structures also differ significantly between these organizational types. Formal organizations maintain clear hierarchical structures with established authority relationships following a chain of command. Simultaneously, informal organizations operate without such hierarchies, allowing members equal authority in decision-making processes.
Formal organizations provide structure through stability and consistency, yet may struggle with bureaucracy and resistance to change. Informal organizations offer flexibility and emotional support, alongside potential challenges like unofficial power structures or favoritism. The relationship between these organizational types is symbiotic, as formal organizations benefit from the emotional support, peer motivation, and collaborative opportunities that informal structures provide.
Essentially, both organizational types coexist within a single entity, influencing and shaping each other. Successful businesses effectively leverage strengths from both formal and informal organizations, integrating structure with flexibility. The balance between these networks optimizes communication and organizational effectiveness, maintaining formal structures for stability while allowing informal networks to flourish.
Examining the dual nature of informal organizations reveals both significant benefits and potential drawbacks for modern businesses. The unplanned social structures that develop alongside formal hierarchies serve critical functions yet can sometimes work against organizational goals.
Informal organizations enable rapid information exchange that bypasses bureaucratic channels. Information flows virtually in all directions without following specific rules or routes, allowing quick feedback and decision-making. Studies indicate informal communication channels spread information significantly faster than formal ones, enhancing overall communication efficiency. This speed proves valuable during unexpected events, as informal groups can rapidly respond across different organizational boundaries.
The direct nature of these interactions builds trust between colleagues. As employees develop personal connections, they become more comfortable seeking assistance from coworkers outside their immediate teams. This improves workflow since employees don’t hesitate to ask for help, ultimately streamlining business operations.
Informal organizations fulfill crucial social and psychological needs that formal structures often neglect. These networks provide emotional support, guidance, and assistance that create a sense of camaraderie. Job satisfaction increases as social needs are met, directly contributing to organizational stability.
The social fabric of informal groups instills unity and solidarity among members through frequent interpersonal interactions. Research demonstrates that employees with workplace friendships experience decreased stress and increased motivation. Correspondingly, a positive influence from informal organizations typically leads to heightened productivity.
Unfortunately, informal communications frequently disseminate rumors and misinformation. Studies reveal approximately 70% of information spread through informal organizational structures consists of rumors that potentially mislead employees. Once incorrect information circulates, it becomes extremely difficult to correct, creating anxiety and eroding trust between workers.
Informal groups often resist changes introduced by management. Since these groups develop their own norms and values, they may feel threatened by new policies or technologies. This resistance can delay or restrict organizational growth when informal organizations oppose implementation of changes. Members typically conform to group standards even when those norms conflict with organizational interests.
Informal leaders sometimes challenge formal management structures. When employees place greater trust in their informal leaders than in formal managers, implementing organizational decisions becomes problematical. This dynamic makes it difficult to maintain proper discipline and control within the organization, resulting in formalization of various activities and processes.
Furthermore, informal groups can create conflicting goals and priorities. Members generally pursue group objectives even when those interests oppose formal organizational aims. This misalignment results in outcomes that negatively impact overall performance. Excessive conformity to group norms that contradict organizational interests represents another significant challenge.
The coexistence of both positive and negative aspects requires strategic management approaches that maximize benefits while minimizing potential disruptions. Organizations that effectively harness informal networks gain valuable advantages in flexibility, communication speed, and employee satisfaction.
Effective management of informal organizations requires strategic approaches that harness their inherent strengths while mitigating potential drawbacks. Leaders who successfully integrate these natural social structures into their management practices gain significant advantages in communication efficiency, employee engagement, and organizational agility.
Creating an environment that fosters open dialog across organizational levels helps channel informal communication productively. Leaders should establish formal channels that complement informal information exchange while maintaining transparency about what topics require formal documentation.
Providing dedicated spaces for casual interactions, such as break rooms, cafeterias, and collaboration areas, makes informal communication more likely to occur naturally. Physical workspace design that facilitates spontaneous interactions breaks down departmental silos, subsequently encouraging cross-functional team collaboration that extends beyond formal boundaries.
Recognizing employees who influence others through their expertise, personality, or relationships—despite lacking formal leadership titles—proves crucial for effective management. These individuals often play pivotal roles in shaping organizational culture and driving change.
Supporting informal leaders through additional resources, mentorship opportunities, or public recognition strengthens their positive impact throughout the organization. Managers can develop these influential employees through targeted training programs that either enhance their current contributions or prepare them for potential formal leadership positions.
Informal networks function most effectively when their objectives support broader organizational goals. Creating alignment requires strategic, clear, and consistent communication at every organizational level, incorporating company objectives into regular team discussions, leadership meetings, and performance reviews. When informal groups understand the organization’s strategic direction, they can channel their collaborative energy toward those shared objectives. This integration helps prevent conflicts between informal and formal priorities, ultimately increasing overall productivity.
Human resources departments play vital roles in strengthening informal organizations through targeted policies and practices. Organizational network analysis (ONA) enables HR to map informal connections visually, providing strategic insights into collaboration patterns, talent identification, and diversity integration.
These analytics reveal key individuals central to communication networks, allowing for focused development initiatives. Additionally, HR can implement recognition programs acknowledging the contributions of informal networks, as organizations with such programs report nearly 15% higher employee engagement and productivity. Regular feedback mechanisms through informal channels provide valuable insights into employee satisfaction and emergent organizational issues.
Understanding and leveraging informal organizations can transform your workplace culture and business performance through strategic management of natural employee networks.
• Informal networks drive 70-80% of workplace communication, making them more influential than formal structures for daily operations and decision-making
• Four key types emerge naturally: interest groups, friendship groups, vertical/horizontal connections, and mixed groups that span departments and hierarchies
• Strategic benefits include faster communication, higher trust, and 25% increased productivity when informal networks align with company goals
• Potential risks require management: rumors spread quickly, informal leaders may undermine authority, and resistance to change can emerge
• Effective management involves identifying informal leaders, encouraging open communication, and using HR tools like organizational network analysis to support these structures
• Balance formal structure with informal flexibility by creating spaces for spontaneous interaction while aligning informal goals with company vision
When properly managed, informal organizations become powerful catalysts for innovation, employee engagement, and organizational agility in modern business environments.
An informal organization is a network of personal and social relationships that naturally develop among employees within a formal organizational structure. It operates without official rules or procedures but significantly influences workplace communication, decision-making, and employee behavior.
While formal organizations have defined hierarchies and structured processes, informal organizations are more fluid and spontaneous. Formal structures focus on specific business goals, whereas informal networks address social and psychological needs of employees, fostering creativity and job satisfaction.
The main types of informal groups in a workplace include interest groups (based on shared hobbies or activities), friendship groups (personal bonds between colleagues), vertical and horizontal groups (connections across or within hierarchical levels), and mixed groups (diverse connections spanning departments and levels).
Informal organizations facilitate faster communication, build trust among employees, boost morale and job satisfaction, and can increase productivity. They also provide emotional support, encourage innovation, and help businesses respond quickly to unexpected situations.
Managers can effectively manage informal organizations by encouraging open communication, identifying and supporting informal leaders, aligning informal goals with the company vision, and using HR tools like organizational network analysis. Creating spaces for casual interactions and recognizing the contributions of informal networks can also be beneficial.
Curious about more HR buzzwords like Employee Assistance Programs (EAP), boomerang employee, 360-degree feedback, or HR Consulting? Dive into our HR Glossary and get clear definitions of the terms that drive modern HR.Explore Taggd for RPO solutions.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |